Difference between revisions of "Shared:Rhizome2KickOff"
(→Kick-off meeting) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=='''Rhizome 2.0: Scaling-up Capability of Human-Robot Interaction Supported Approaches for Robotically 3D-printing Extraterrestrial Habitats'''== | =='''Rhizome 2.0: Scaling-up Capability of Human-Robot Interaction Supported Approaches for Robotically 3D-printing Extraterrestrial Habitats'''== | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
<div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center"> | <div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center"> | ||
[[Shared:Rhizome2KickOff|'''Kick-off''']] | [[Shared:Rhizome2KickOff|'''Kick-off''']] | ||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
<div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center"> | <div style="float:left; width: 110px; height: 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px;" align="center"> | ||
[[Shared:Rhizome2Review4|'''Review 4''']] | [[Shared:Rhizome2Review4|'''Review 4''']] | ||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 34: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''Preliminary literature study:''' |
Latest revision as of 07:22, 25 June 2024
Rhizome 2.0: Scaling-up Capability of Human-Robot Interaction Supported Approaches for Robotically 3D-printing Extraterrestrial Habitats
Kick-off
Kick-off meeting
Proposal, agenda, and notes:
Proposal https://ideas.esa.int/servlet/hype/IMT?userAction=Browse&templateName=&documentId=941256c1dd12f6338d97081aabbd148f, agenda https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gqgh-6T-0DzogKOD7ikOpL1v9KFzMv9D/view, and notes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1br0DV16xeupi6nuc2ei2Lexgr4abrE8y/view
Presentation:
Henriette Bier: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1S81X1cv65G7uPPnnCV-3fl-NHqJTapVt/view
Preliminary literature study:
1. Printing with cement-less concrete
Coppola et al, Binder Alternative to Portland Cement and waste management for sustainable construction, 2018 [1]
Dada, Influence of temperature on the rheological behaviour of eco-mortar, 2021 [2]
Djobo et al, Volcanic ash-based geopolymer cements/concretes: the current state of the art and perspectives. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 4433–4446 (2017). [3]
Liu et al, In-situ resources for infrastructure construction on Mars: A review, 2021 [4]
Nazneen et al, Geopolymer: A potential alternative binder for the sustainable development of concrete without ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Industrial Pollution Con-trol, 2017, pages 1500-1504. [5]
Schiavone et al, Pozzolan Based 3D Printing Composites From the Formulation, 2020 [6]
The Schumacher centre, Alternatives to Portland Cement [7]
2. In Situ Printing and (AI & HRI supported) in situ assembly of 3D printed components
NASA 3D Printed Habitat Challenge: Hassell Studio [8]
Overview In-Situ 3D Printing References: In-Situ 3D Printing References
ISRU-BASED ROBOTIC CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR LUNAR AND MARTIAN INFRASTRUCTURES [9]
3. (AI supported) Environment Control
Climate-Resilient Robotic Facades: Architectural Strategies to Improve Thermal Comfort in Outdoor Urban Environments using Robotic Assembly [10]
4. CV- and AI-supported Applications in CS and UF
MSc 2 IA Studio 2023: Rhizome 2.0 [11]
